I have followed him some, and have friends "in his community" which is a nice way to say it. What is "Diverse Cosmology"? On the Reset idea, I have watched as they use mundane astrological indicators over and over again in this exercise. They also use other occult indicators. This Reset kicked off with the Ingress from Earth to Air signs for the Jupiter-Saturn cycle. I don't recall the exact year of when Earth started, but it is around the 1850s iirc.
But man, that back and forth is just bullying at the "tribe" level. People gotta belong! I get that sort of treatment when I talk about flat earth being the controlled opp to the psyop.
I have only seen his behavior with me, haven't had an adult conversation with him about his work. I don't see him wanting that either. Scrutiny is a threat to him in his current life which makes him dangerous on a pedestal. The entire population worships people like this. It's necessary for where we are and how we must learn to use our own sonar.
You already hit the nail on the head-- People gotta tribe! I figured that as such in 2020 and need a new tribe, so wound up living with Meru people and the Maasai.
Don’t feel like you’re the only one who’s tried James. ANYONE who challenges Jason directly gets blocked and/or deleted. If he doesn’t do it himself his followers will.
Jason can not tolerate the spiritual or supernatural depth (which is not separate from his data.) He can not see the direct connection.
It appears he thinks James is too insignificant to bother with. I'd imagine that's why Graham Hancock et al. ignore Jason's challenges to debate.. He's insignificant to them.
I am definitely not a supporter of Jason. I have been turned off by the gang mentality of the group and the myopic world view that he presents and sells as fact.
These books in which he is well read- does he know that they have a triple meaning? Does he know that many chronicle an Initiate’s journey to Soul Consciousness and finally Occult Mastership? I could see where only surface level comprehension of the material would confuse.
It is not a surprise at all that he did not want to engage in dialogue with you; your posture must be incredibly threatening and foreign to him. He has quite a capricious character when he thinks he is being challenged.
I tried to bring his attention to the multifaceted meanings of the text in which he is quoting yet he insist on stating that only his theory is the right theory there can be no inner windings, and anyone who questions him will be eliminated from his pack
Sad thing is he in denial of the situation in which he was in prison to begin with he got involved with the wrong crowd, and didn’t know how to handle that situation which cost him a large portion of his life. Now he credits that period for his garnering of knowledge
He does bring some good things to the table through some sort of handler
As for the people he has had discord with, he knows that they are equally as under educated as he is he can’t argue with Robert Sepher because he is a well trained anthropologist archaeologist
Robert has no intention of communicating with him. He does not do. Interviews, rarely speaks in public and publishes his own works via media uploads on Patreon, YouTube and other platforms such as Twitter X.
People have no desire to hear the truth because they will have to change their belief system
You should speak to Sol Luckman James. I'm a big fan of you both. You both have similar ideas about the rendering of reality.
I really liked Archaix at first but got concerned by the dogma. All starts to feel like a cult after a while. And yeah, a lot of the stuff isn't really verifiable unless I deep dive into ancient books for the rest of my life. As you say, convenient. We are powerful creators so this theory of his could be dangerous, for them at least.
Regarding lying, I was referring to Jason's research, not the recent exchange between the two of you. I was stepping midstream into a discussion that I didn't completely understand, my mistake entirely.
Inaccuracies in attribution are certainly distressing, and bear further investigation. He does give links of pdfs of his reference materials, and links to gumroad, and other sources for the texts that he uses. I'm grateful to have gained a new familiarity with Pliny the Elder, William Corliss, Herodotus, and others that I have encountered through the Archaix research. It gives me a jumping off point to research further and come to my own conclusions, which may or may not match his.
I'll end by stating this: truth doesn't require belief, or champions, or cheerleaders. It is a force that reveals itself for the purpose of adherence. When people look to others to render a complete truth for the purpose of belief, a power-imbalance is created.
Gurus are born, sending neophytes through their personal labyrinth so that the neophytes may duplicate the gurus experience with a foundational truth. This is the same problem that I have with religion and politics. If you are in a process to discern truth for yourself, others are not in a position to make a commodity of your convictions. That is why humans need truth, not truth communities.
To me, truth is fashion and logic is petrified limbic memory in the cerebellum which means belief is all we ever know and we simply mistake petrified belief for logic and truth. This is why we are symbiotic instead of isolated. What’s cool about this is I can read your position and still agree with it because I know my truth and your truth are manifestations of belief.
Thanks James. This is a sharp response to the Twitter exchange I watched in real time. I don't buy Jason's cosmology either. Terrence McKenna's wisdom is apt here: "My attitude was always if it’s real, it can take the pressure. You don’t have to pussy foot around the real thing. If they’re telling you that you must lower your voice and avert your gaze, then you’re probably in the presence of crap; because the real thing is real. It doesn’t demand that you adjust your opinion to suit it."
Jason is vicious and is quick to send his hoards of sock account bandits after you if he even gets the tiniest criticism. Just ask jaydreamerz on YouTube what will happen if you even hint at a different idea then the one he is selling. Jaydreamerz is big on comparative mythology and that threatened Jason somehow and sent the hyenas after him.
The drama caused by Jason’s lack of interpersonal skills has become somewhat tiresome. As is the lack of self awareness to realise that, based on the very spiritual principles he operates by, that his own actions and intentions are what bring him into constant conflict with people who he differs with by matters of degrees.
I personally think his information is sound and the Phoenix theory is legit: if our Realm is still standing by 2040, I assume it will play out largely as he proposes. Although I also don’t particularly give a fuck about what is likely to happen beyond 24 months from now, let alone 2040.
He definitely did not want to dialog with me about his theories and this seems to be his problem deep down. We can call it a quirk, but if someone is confident in what they know, they literally act the opposite of how Jason did today. I think he's got you conned but i know you don't care since you're already sold. Appreciate the feedback. I don't know his work. I was told i would need to read 100 books before I could approach him. lol
Evidently, Jason’s getting high on his own supply. The world is full of cults and he’s just another cult leader, one who ex-communicates those that dare question him. Just another Abrahamic disguised as a ‘truth-dealer.’
I define lying as speech communicated as knowingly untrue with an intent to deceive.
After years of listening to the both of you, I don't detect willing deception.
Perhaps defining that term more specifically would encourage a more civil and constructive discussion. No one likes being called a liar, least of all when their exhaustively referenced output has not been reviewed.
I agree that lying means someone who is knowingly trying to deceive. The screenshots show that pretty clearly. Maybe it's hard to accept? If not, I need more specifics on where you think the categorization doesn't fit. I want to grow from this too.
Your statement was correct from the onset, science and physics backs you up on this regard your body is a toroid system, but do you see the radiating energy that creates a bubble around you?
No
Our mind is a very powerful tool. It is the most impressive computer known to man quantum computers cannot compete with the human brain even though their quantum chips use human brain organoids
AI is a compilation of all internet uploaded data thus a little more advanced than correct incorrect yes or no binary code it is also programmed to default to the NWO line of thought which is not correct rather a system to control and enslave
I get the concept that beliefs are lies and therefore everyone is ultimately a “liar”, but if this is true your statement is invalidated by your claim to it. It renders your defaming of JB in response to him blocking you as petty. If your real intention was to debate him (or have a conversation) you could’ve easily gotten it done, couldn’t you?
Man, you were way too apologetic. I've been blocked from Jason's Twitter for the unforgivable crime of posting "beware of false prophets" in one of his threads and then when people said that Jason didn't declare himself a prophet - I attached a screenshot from one of his videos that he titled: " Confessions of a Dark Prophet".
James, this guy is the L Ron Hubbard of our time. He's got a core group of fanatics that will lick his boots at the snap of a finger. They can't think for themselves, so they cling to their wise leader to tell them what to do.
Jason is not gaining traction in the community. He brings very little that is new to the table and his 138 year hypothesis is painfully unsupported by any compelling evidence. 1902 wasn't any kind of reset year when something happened in the mid to late 1800s that involved orphan trains, insane asylums, world fairs and mud floods.
But, that thesis is his bread and butter. You can't kick at it without toppling the whole Jenga tower he's created. This is why any reasonable criticism will get silenced and he'll command his attack dogs on whoever calls him out. Jaydreamerz, Billy Carson and you.
Forget that guy. He's not worth engaging with. I was with him at 14k subs and I've grown tired of his ramblings and the cult he's created around himself.
Seen enough of his videos to know what a huge hypocrite he is. The channel Tartarian Truth has plenty of examples.
Ron Hubbard was a sham as well yet he’s a great method of concealment of Alister Crowley’ works considered by many to be the most important works of magik ever compiled
Billy Carson is paid to promote semi truth and misinterpretation
most of the people that are allowed to have a large following in this arena are most likely handlers to some degree
Rudolph Steiner has contributed more factual content (with nominal personal bias contributions in his scope of work) that being said he spent most of his life on composing what he claimed to be his most important work “the philosophy of freedom”
The book is designed for the spiritually inept to learn every personality type to know the flaws and positive factors in each personalities way of viewing the world, as well as manner of thinking through this process of exploring, every type of personalityone could train the mind for the unseen world thus gain their personal vril, (he does not coin that word though it is German) personal freedom is found from within (anarchy was his original word for freedom he decided to remove it because of societies, changing definition of anarchy)
His goal was for the individual to have the tools to be the best person they could be and to attain their highest potential through separation of the super sensible from the ethereal world. He did this by incorporating what he was taught in secret societies, not withscluding Goethe’s works and the writings he reviewed for various journal publications
He contributed much to the literary world
in writings and lectures which are extensive
Jason is not open to his extensive body of works as it would more than likely discredit his own systems as if anything Steiner was, is an in depth historian at minimum
The modern educational system has labeled him pseudoscience probably because pseudo science actually means the inability to disprove using scientific methods
Our world isn’t as we perceive it, which is the real gist of this entire subject
This claim is a primary foundation in several fields of physics
There is much that we cannot see that goes on in front of us daily.
Our air is a primary example of this, through scientific studies we do have a very good idea of what air contains for life to exist and to the great extent that can be manipulated and have life exist to some degree, which deviates other fields such as Geoengineering
I could discuss Emmanuel Velkoski, and Zachariah Steichen’s influences on Breashers though many of Jason’s followers are familiar with their works
There is far more Creedence in Immanuel Velikovsky‘s work, than Stitchen’s
The greatest example of our world, not being as we perceive it is people fighting over Harris versus Trump, as if they are not part of the same league of euthanizing eugenicist, death cult practitioners, Zionist predominantly though not exclusively
Jason probably anticipated a response to his challenge from the same vantage point from which it was derived. I would offer that Jason is quite unique in both his abilities and life experiences which has lead to two things. One is an impressive body of work that is indeed impeccable and derived untouched by the corrupted halls of academia via an under represented demographic, and two, an understandable lack of plasticity in social contexts that has made him hypersensitive to criticism to the point that he blocks even devoted supporters if he perceives even a hint of conflict.
James, you too are profoundly unique and in an entirely different fashion. Is it any wonder that wires got crossed?
Your desire to meet his challenge was noble, even appreciated, and had a dialogue been entered into properly (platform limitations and personality matters transcended), everyone would have been marveling at the new theoretical territory you two could have opened up. You two would have been like pigs in shit if you both weren't so clumsy about how to navigate a fucking mud puddle.
I apologized to Jason three times today and spent hours tracking down his prison yard antics across three platforms to try and make it right. My letter doesn't even mention his felony conviction for aggravated sexual assault. Nor the fact he's changed his names to avoid being caught. You've shown me how he wins because people like you will always take the middle every time.
You've got him so wrong it ain't even funny, James. But most people make the same assumptions and trip over their own dicks everytime. Jason is a walking litmus test and you just managed to expose yourself, not him.
Christine. “Aggregated sexual assault” is not funny. Someone got hurt and Jason is a convicted sex offender. STFU with the “funny” please. You’re clearly addicted to his musk
Yep, people assume he rapped someone. No doubt you made the same assumption. Rape is just faster to type than "aggravated sexual assault" "convicted sex offender". You prefer to frame your slander with more official sounding terms. You're still wrong. Did you even read my first comment? It doesn't appear you did.
I must be getting Alzheimer's because I can't figure out what the issue is here....lots of talk about not agreeing with each other, but not many specifics about 'why' . Archaix now resembles a cult. That said, if you looked at Archaix, godgevlamste, vibes of cosmos, and FPVangel, you would see four different takes on how this realm operates, and what it is. But most of the attributes of reality touted by these four groups are not mutually exclusive of the other groups. One could throw in a handful of other worldviews, and the same would be true.
On the face of it, the disagreement, if there really is one, seems to be rooted in differences in communication style. Meanwhile, at the uttermost ends of the earth, a common garden aphantasiac ornamental hermit sits on his porch, in the sun, and sees the psychic crisis at the end of the world paralleled in a kaleidoscope. What pretty patterns it makes!!
I guess you could read the title to help you get my jist. Dude blocked me. I wanted to reply. I did. I like humanity because the conflicts are informative. I write almost exclusively about the human experience so my column may be a bumpy ride for you.
Oh, so you didn't even get to the meat and potatoes with him. That's a shame, because I'd love to read a critique of his theories.
re bumpy ride. I think you're the one having a bumpy ride because that's a whole lotta energy used up on a 'block'.
I'm outside tending my garden, planting some weeds. If its any consolation, I have watched a few of your youtube vids, a while back. And I enjoyed them. :)
To be fair when Jason stays on subject it’s one of my favourite channels. His research and the thesis he has created from it is something special.. I appreciate your diplomacy James and think you should try and get back in touch with him, he’s easily triggered but I’ve also seen him admit he was wrong. (Maybe he reacted by being called a “liar” without making the effort to understand the context. Anyway I think He’s all bark and no bite. I agree with you however about reality being rendered and have mentioned this in some form or another in his chat rooms. . The archaix reality is rendered to such a deep level it can be inspiring, even if not necessarily ‘true’.
I think if he was an adult or if you felt he was an adult you would be telling him this instead of me. I already tried to approach him. Then I apologized to him. He declared war on me. I don’t think you are being fair to him but not telling him this. Glad you Injoy his channel. I hope his dishonesty with me doesn’t stop you from enjoying the community. I think people are the most important thing. He is def a liar though. And no one will tell him he treated me unfairly. Everyone knows but doesn’t care is what I see. I think you abandon him by treating him this way.
Important lessons hayokas learn at a very young age: your very presence threatens everyone in the room with something to hide. Well done James True.
Tapping into the Orca of Delphi
I have followed him some, and have friends "in his community" which is a nice way to say it. What is "Diverse Cosmology"? On the Reset idea, I have watched as they use mundane astrological indicators over and over again in this exercise. They also use other occult indicators. This Reset kicked off with the Ingress from Earth to Air signs for the Jupiter-Saturn cycle. I don't recall the exact year of when Earth started, but it is around the 1850s iirc.
But man, that back and forth is just bullying at the "tribe" level. People gotta belong! I get that sort of treatment when I talk about flat earth being the controlled opp to the psyop.
I have only seen his behavior with me, haven't had an adult conversation with him about his work. I don't see him wanting that either. Scrutiny is a threat to him in his current life which makes him dangerous on a pedestal. The entire population worships people like this. It's necessary for where we are and how we must learn to use our own sonar.
You already hit the nail on the head-- People gotta tribe! I figured that as such in 2020 and need a new tribe, so wound up living with Meru people and the Maasai.
Don’t feel like you’re the only one who’s tried James. ANYONE who challenges Jason directly gets blocked and/or deleted. If he doesn’t do it himself his followers will.
Jason can not tolerate the spiritual or supernatural depth (which is not separate from his data.) He can not see the direct connection.
He is quite immature in this area.
It appears he thinks James is too insignificant to bother with. I'd imagine that's why Graham Hancock et al. ignore Jason's challenges to debate.. He's insignificant to them.
I’ve thought this too.
I am definitely not a supporter of Jason. I have been turned off by the gang mentality of the group and the myopic world view that he presents and sells as fact.
These books in which he is well read- does he know that they have a triple meaning? Does he know that many chronicle an Initiate’s journey to Soul Consciousness and finally Occult Mastership? I could see where only surface level comprehension of the material would confuse.
It is not a surprise at all that he did not want to engage in dialogue with you; your posture must be incredibly threatening and foreign to him. He has quite a capricious character when he thinks he is being challenged.
I tried to bring his attention to the multifaceted meanings of the text in which he is quoting yet he insist on stating that only his theory is the right theory there can be no inner windings, and anyone who questions him will be eliminated from his pack
Sad thing is he in denial of the situation in which he was in prison to begin with he got involved with the wrong crowd, and didn’t know how to handle that situation which cost him a large portion of his life. Now he credits that period for his garnering of knowledge
He does bring some good things to the table through some sort of handler
As for the people he has had discord with, he knows that they are equally as under educated as he is he can’t argue with Robert Sepher because he is a well trained anthropologist archaeologist
Robert has no intention of communicating with him. He does not do. Interviews, rarely speaks in public and publishes his own works via media uploads on Patreon, YouTube and other platforms such as Twitter X.
People have no desire to hear the truth because they will have to change their belief system
Well said Lauren.
You should speak to Sol Luckman James. I'm a big fan of you both. You both have similar ideas about the rendering of reality.
I really liked Archaix at first but got concerned by the dogma. All starts to feel like a cult after a while. And yeah, a lot of the stuff isn't really verifiable unless I deep dive into ancient books for the rest of my life. As you say, convenient. We are powerful creators so this theory of his could be dangerous, for them at least.
Regarding lying, I was referring to Jason's research, not the recent exchange between the two of you. I was stepping midstream into a discussion that I didn't completely understand, my mistake entirely.
Inaccuracies in attribution are certainly distressing, and bear further investigation. He does give links of pdfs of his reference materials, and links to gumroad, and other sources for the texts that he uses. I'm grateful to have gained a new familiarity with Pliny the Elder, William Corliss, Herodotus, and others that I have encountered through the Archaix research. It gives me a jumping off point to research further and come to my own conclusions, which may or may not match his.
I'll end by stating this: truth doesn't require belief, or champions, or cheerleaders. It is a force that reveals itself for the purpose of adherence. When people look to others to render a complete truth for the purpose of belief, a power-imbalance is created.
Gurus are born, sending neophytes through their personal labyrinth so that the neophytes may duplicate the gurus experience with a foundational truth. This is the same problem that I have with religion and politics. If you are in a process to discern truth for yourself, others are not in a position to make a commodity of your convictions. That is why humans need truth, not truth communities.
To me, truth is fashion and logic is petrified limbic memory in the cerebellum which means belief is all we ever know and we simply mistake petrified belief for logic and truth. This is why we are symbiotic instead of isolated. What’s cool about this is I can read your position and still agree with it because I know my truth and your truth are manifestations of belief.
Thanks James. This is a sharp response to the Twitter exchange I watched in real time. I don't buy Jason's cosmology either. Terrence McKenna's wisdom is apt here: "My attitude was always if it’s real, it can take the pressure. You don’t have to pussy foot around the real thing. If they’re telling you that you must lower your voice and avert your gaze, then you’re probably in the presence of crap; because the real thing is real. It doesn’t demand that you adjust your opinion to suit it."
Jason is vicious and is quick to send his hoards of sock account bandits after you if he even gets the tiniest criticism. Just ask jaydreamerz on YouTube what will happen if you even hint at a different idea then the one he is selling. Jaydreamerz is big on comparative mythology and that threatened Jason somehow and sent the hyenas after him.
“I get why you believe history deletes itself. You did it today with your footprints.” The True has spoken.
The drama caused by Jason’s lack of interpersonal skills has become somewhat tiresome. As is the lack of self awareness to realise that, based on the very spiritual principles he operates by, that his own actions and intentions are what bring him into constant conflict with people who he differs with by matters of degrees.
I personally think his information is sound and the Phoenix theory is legit: if our Realm is still standing by 2040, I assume it will play out largely as he proposes. Although I also don’t particularly give a fuck about what is likely to happen beyond 24 months from now, let alone 2040.
He definitely did not want to dialog with me about his theories and this seems to be his problem deep down. We can call it a quirk, but if someone is confident in what they know, they literally act the opposite of how Jason did today. I think he's got you conned but i know you don't care since you're already sold. Appreciate the feedback. I don't know his work. I was told i would need to read 100 books before I could approach him. lol
I've learned quite a bit from Jason and his sources. Dude has a hair trigger though.
Friction between research communities doesn't speak well of those involved, and distracts from the process of sharing knowledge to enrich our lives.
Evidently, Jason’s getting high on his own supply. The world is full of cults and he’s just another cult leader, one who ex-communicates those that dare question him. Just another Abrahamic disguised as a ‘truth-dealer.’
I define lying as speech communicated as knowingly untrue with an intent to deceive.
After years of listening to the both of you, I don't detect willing deception.
Perhaps defining that term more specifically would encourage a more civil and constructive discussion. No one likes being called a liar, least of all when their exhaustively referenced output has not been reviewed.
I agree that lying means someone who is knowingly trying to deceive. The screenshots show that pretty clearly. Maybe it's hard to accept? If not, I need more specifics on where you think the categorization doesn't fit. I want to grow from this too.
Your statement was correct from the onset, science and physics backs you up on this regard your body is a toroid system, but do you see the radiating energy that creates a bubble around you?
No
Our mind is a very powerful tool. It is the most impressive computer known to man quantum computers cannot compete with the human brain even though their quantum chips use human brain organoids
AI is a compilation of all internet uploaded data thus a little more advanced than correct incorrect yes or no binary code it is also programmed to default to the NWO line of thought which is not correct rather a system to control and enslave
I get the concept that beliefs are lies and therefore everyone is ultimately a “liar”, but if this is true your statement is invalidated by your claim to it. It renders your defaming of JB in response to him blocking you as petty. If your real intention was to debate him (or have a conversation) you could’ve easily gotten it done, couldn’t you?
I answered you in another thread,
Zreno. I get you’re hurt but let’s not play do-overs.
Man, you were way too apologetic. I've been blocked from Jason's Twitter for the unforgivable crime of posting "beware of false prophets" in one of his threads and then when people said that Jason didn't declare himself a prophet - I attached a screenshot from one of his videos that he titled: " Confessions of a Dark Prophet".
James, this guy is the L Ron Hubbard of our time. He's got a core group of fanatics that will lick his boots at the snap of a finger. They can't think for themselves, so they cling to their wise leader to tell them what to do.
Jason is not gaining traction in the community. He brings very little that is new to the table and his 138 year hypothesis is painfully unsupported by any compelling evidence. 1902 wasn't any kind of reset year when something happened in the mid to late 1800s that involved orphan trains, insane asylums, world fairs and mud floods.
But, that thesis is his bread and butter. You can't kick at it without toppling the whole Jenga tower he's created. This is why any reasonable criticism will get silenced and he'll command his attack dogs on whoever calls him out. Jaydreamerz, Billy Carson and you.
Forget that guy. He's not worth engaging with. I was with him at 14k subs and I've grown tired of his ramblings and the cult he's created around himself.
Seen enough of his videos to know what a huge hypocrite he is. The channel Tartarian Truth has plenty of examples.
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLQCVvMkAtJWu3Z0gfKeY0D5LBRDfE5Ui_&feature=shared
Ron Hubbard was a sham as well yet he’s a great method of concealment of Alister Crowley’ works considered by many to be the most important works of magik ever compiled
Billy Carson is paid to promote semi truth and misinterpretation
most of the people that are allowed to have a large following in this arena are most likely handlers to some degree
Rudolph Steiner has contributed more factual content (with nominal personal bias contributions in his scope of work) that being said he spent most of his life on composing what he claimed to be his most important work “the philosophy of freedom”
The book is designed for the spiritually inept to learn every personality type to know the flaws and positive factors in each personalities way of viewing the world, as well as manner of thinking through this process of exploring, every type of personalityone could train the mind for the unseen world thus gain their personal vril, (he does not coin that word though it is German) personal freedom is found from within (anarchy was his original word for freedom he decided to remove it because of societies, changing definition of anarchy)
His goal was for the individual to have the tools to be the best person they could be and to attain their highest potential through separation of the super sensible from the ethereal world. He did this by incorporating what he was taught in secret societies, not withscluding Goethe’s works and the writings he reviewed for various journal publications
He contributed much to the literary world
in writings and lectures which are extensive
Jason is not open to his extensive body of works as it would more than likely discredit his own systems as if anything Steiner was, is an in depth historian at minimum
The modern educational system has labeled him pseudoscience probably because pseudo science actually means the inability to disprove using scientific methods
Our world isn’t as we perceive it, which is the real gist of this entire subject
This claim is a primary foundation in several fields of physics
There is much that we cannot see that goes on in front of us daily.
Our air is a primary example of this, through scientific studies we do have a very good idea of what air contains for life to exist and to the great extent that can be manipulated and have life exist to some degree, which deviates other fields such as Geoengineering
I could discuss Emmanuel Velkoski, and Zachariah Steichen’s influences on Breashers though many of Jason’s followers are familiar with their works
There is far more Creedence in Immanuel Velikovsky‘s work, than Stitchen’s
The greatest example of our world, not being as we perceive it is people fighting over Harris versus Trump, as if they are not part of the same league of euthanizing eugenicist, death cult practitioners, Zionist predominantly though not exclusively
Jason probably anticipated a response to his challenge from the same vantage point from which it was derived. I would offer that Jason is quite unique in both his abilities and life experiences which has lead to two things. One is an impressive body of work that is indeed impeccable and derived untouched by the corrupted halls of academia via an under represented demographic, and two, an understandable lack of plasticity in social contexts that has made him hypersensitive to criticism to the point that he blocks even devoted supporters if he perceives even a hint of conflict.
James, you too are profoundly unique and in an entirely different fashion. Is it any wonder that wires got crossed?
Your desire to meet his challenge was noble, even appreciated, and had a dialogue been entered into properly (platform limitations and personality matters transcended), everyone would have been marveling at the new theoretical territory you two could have opened up. You two would have been like pigs in shit if you both weren't so clumsy about how to navigate a fucking mud puddle.
I apologized to Jason three times today and spent hours tracking down his prison yard antics across three platforms to try and make it right. My letter doesn't even mention his felony conviction for aggravated sexual assault. Nor the fact he's changed his names to avoid being caught. You've shown me how he wins because people like you will always take the middle every time.
You've got him so wrong it ain't even funny, James. But most people make the same assumptions and trip over their own dicks everytime. Jason is a walking litmus test and you just managed to expose yourself, not him.
Christine. “Aggregated sexual assault” is not funny. Someone got hurt and Jason is a convicted sex offender. STFU with the “funny” please. You’re clearly addicted to his musk
He didn't rape anyone, but wouldn't it be so much easier for you if he had?
You typed "rape" Christine. But wouldn't it be easier if i had?
Yep, people assume he rapped someone. No doubt you made the same assumption. Rape is just faster to type than "aggravated sexual assault" "convicted sex offender". You prefer to frame your slander with more official sounding terms. You're still wrong. Did you even read my first comment? It doesn't appear you did.
I must be getting Alzheimer's because I can't figure out what the issue is here....lots of talk about not agreeing with each other, but not many specifics about 'why' . Archaix now resembles a cult. That said, if you looked at Archaix, godgevlamste, vibes of cosmos, and FPVangel, you would see four different takes on how this realm operates, and what it is. But most of the attributes of reality touted by these four groups are not mutually exclusive of the other groups. One could throw in a handful of other worldviews, and the same would be true.
On the face of it, the disagreement, if there really is one, seems to be rooted in differences in communication style. Meanwhile, at the uttermost ends of the earth, a common garden aphantasiac ornamental hermit sits on his porch, in the sun, and sees the psychic crisis at the end of the world paralleled in a kaleidoscope. What pretty patterns it makes!!
I guess you could read the title to help you get my jist. Dude blocked me. I wanted to reply. I did. I like humanity because the conflicts are informative. I write almost exclusively about the human experience so my column may be a bumpy ride for you.
Oh, so you didn't even get to the meat and potatoes with him. That's a shame, because I'd love to read a critique of his theories.
re bumpy ride. I think you're the one having a bumpy ride because that's a whole lotta energy used up on a 'block'.
I'm outside tending my garden, planting some weeds. If its any consolation, I have watched a few of your youtube vids, a while back. And I enjoyed them. :)
I thought you said you were suffering from Alzheimer’s?
Oh, I don't remember that. 😛
To be fair when Jason stays on subject it’s one of my favourite channels. His research and the thesis he has created from it is something special.. I appreciate your diplomacy James and think you should try and get back in touch with him, he’s easily triggered but I’ve also seen him admit he was wrong. (Maybe he reacted by being called a “liar” without making the effort to understand the context. Anyway I think He’s all bark and no bite. I agree with you however about reality being rendered and have mentioned this in some form or another in his chat rooms. . The archaix reality is rendered to such a deep level it can be inspiring, even if not necessarily ‘true’.
I think if he was an adult or if you felt he was an adult you would be telling him this instead of me. I already tried to approach him. Then I apologized to him. He declared war on me. I don’t think you are being fair to him but not telling him this. Glad you Injoy his channel. I hope his dishonesty with me doesn’t stop you from enjoying the community. I think people are the most important thing. He is def a liar though. And no one will tell him he treated me unfairly. Everyone knows but doesn’t care is what I see. I think you abandon him by treating him this way.
You’re a liar. (I’m sorry) ✌️
I think you’re “sorry” bc you don’t really have any beef with me but lack the courage to confront Jason.