Dear James, I was amazed at how sync once again we get to be. i just had a rough week ( lol in fact I appreciated the challenge, brought more calories) going all out against the cathy o bryen blind followers that bind themself to hollowers.
so first i dont think your ruining your show by pissing off some faithaholic on pedosubmarines ride, i think your simply filtering the gold amongst the sand. Maybe some people start gold and turn sand as the opposite is quite the goal of the alchemist.
Maybe when you do this, some golden goat comes back to congratulate your darefull attempt at going against the wave that alrdy goes against the wave without even going back to the first current. I guess thats confusing but you do understand what i mean.
Now fun time! Guess what happened to me this week and its related to Cathy? I called her out publicly and got shut down 3 times in 1 hours. Complete silence by the host and cathy about my single simplest question, and the chat zone also wished to hear the answer by the end of my whinning. I was literaly waking up some of the sleepers so they erased me. i came back (temporary ban i guess), and kept on until well... nada... they never answered...
SO! I am asking you and i know another wise owl will read this and probably guess her name in that sentence: i want CLEAN FREE SARD ;) now the question:
What is your Grand father's of the blue lodge name?
Follow up same question, what is the name of your father?
Now i'm wondering, how come i never ever been able to found this answer altho i am quite a good gravedigger and quite a masons stalker. Here is the live event where ther is a QQQ question time in end show and a t1h22 you can see me in the chat box poundering the question. Now any of you all wise one knows the name of papa and grandpa O,Bryen?
Ok my rambling on O'bryen is done, back at your show! That i soooo appreciate the value. I understand totaly your situation...being torn apart between knowing how to do the jester and please the audience but not wanting this, wanting the audience to become a jester like you and understand the beauty and art behind all this naturality. I sure thought this was the vibe and that was the goal when i rided with your crew a couple months ago.
So i just wanted to give you two notion and i'm sure you already got them in that interesting brain of yours. But knowing a total stranger from quebec as goofy as me share this notion may bring a smile back and ease the stress of ruining is groundbase. Your simply cutting badweeds to see greener grass grow in my opinion. So here is the 2 fact:
1. Even if you sometimes may feel that the unicity of your ship is not 100% top notch, your ship is on a sea where my ship is and some other pirate I know sails the same sea. We get it, so you are witnessed. That Authenticity is BeAuTiFuLl by the way, even behind that mask=)
2. Why you do this to yourself is a question simple to answer, integrity. Why you stay popular by constantly doing this auto sabotage is to answer, q charming mystery! I'm gonna follow up on your call! Cathy Obryen is a fake psyop, i think Keven Annette too, i'm even wondering about the long ago man if they werent some kinda scape goat psyop to. Like Jeanne d'arc and Gille de Raie. Rusted brand, tuck her carl's son, all the likes are like voltaire, double sided coin benefiting of the histery that provokes the mistery they promote. Same goes for all the new age and freemasons stuff. Thats why we...are thorn between this feeling( yep i considere myself in the same tourment you just shared today) so as i was saying, we are thorn between the wanting to get our fellow human out of the cavern, and tempted by using the skills we get from learning whats outside of the cavern on them to make a living. We always choose first, so we always stay on the verge of solvability.. then we go crazy cause no one sees what we see and the opportunity laying around this beautifull prison! I know! Lets call the prison FREE. what a beautifull name for a DOME ;)
Your books are the main inspiration to the one i am currently writting and if we still have a society by the time I end it, i am SURE you will love it! I'll send you one for free just for the feedback.
You remember Jack kruze? The man who got some wild spirit but some brain to it? I'M still wondering if he's trustable or not, And i got this new one on my radar i'd wanna do a check on him. Ole dammegard... got any opinion on him?
Here is people i trust altho i barely know them: You, Matt ereth, James true, Yann Roshdy, elsa is elsa, terreza corragio, fast eddy, Escanor Opium Slayer, Richard Carrier, Richard of the 3 Sage, and Richard my last father in law. There's a couple more but i want to emphasize on one thing they all got in common. They all legit human like you and me. Full of flaws strenght and weakness, beautifull in there unique way. Some are rough, some are weak, some are funny some are amazone style, some hate each other some are rich most are poor, but ALL of them are WISE as F*cK! And have that one thing in common, they share the knowledge they (L)earn. TY all my virtual dojo master
I have followed Ole Dammegard for more than a decade and until recently I found him a valuable source of information. The latest missives I have seen show him irritable and disagreeable, even jaded and bored. He now lives in Bali I believe and gives the impression that he has had enough and wishes to retire. A mutual friend tried to get Ole and I together for a podcast/interview but Ole was not interested. A few weeks later he gave an interview to that mutual friend without me..... so I guess the great man thinks he is superior in some way. That is my honest experience of the man.
Geeeeez louiseeee! This time i tought i had you. Guess your really every where! Not only you know him, but decade long follow up and real life recent experience. Ok, i bow down, you couldnt give me a better answer really 😇👍
I still miss the point. I am not remotely titillated and I do not buy pills, potions or books. I have seen enough of Cathy O'Brien, Epstein, Bannon and Trump to know that I am not interested to know more about any of them. They are all despicable.
You wrote “I don’t believe in loosh”. What exactly does that word mean for you?
For me, it is attention. Focus on a particular idea, feeling or image. That’s all. There are various gradations and vectors of this, ranging from bliss, to outrage, to “garmanbozia” (awe and terror).
I don’t agree with Mark Passio on most things, but I do agree with him on his definition of the “generative principle”: that which we give our attention to, we create. The Freemasons use this principle; Passio says the “G” in the masonic logo stands for “Generative”. Claiming to be a former insider, he should know, right?
So, your attention was drawn to this thread, with enough energy to leave a comment. That motivation is known only to you. I’m not questioning your motive, just stating the fact that your attention, the “loosh” (by my definition) drew you here.
Everything you’re saying about Cathy O’Brien, et al, may be true. It’s certainly true for you, based on the energy I’m perceiving around the word “despicable”. Just my perception, but here we are, having this dialogue on James’s Stack, not yours.
I actually have compassion for Cathy. Who I find questionable is her handler Mark Phillips. He apparently got his mitts on Brice Taylor, so I find her testimony suspect as well. And I want to believe; I have a personal history in these types of matters, but I also have done my healing and shadow work around this so I don’t buy into others’ accounts blindly.
Where am I going with this?
Loosh is real.
It’s demand side economics.
Why do these people (and I’m including Alex Jones and Joe Rogan in this as well, along with many others. I recently watched a video by Matt Ehret, whose erudition on matters I respect from his work on Global Research, and was appalled at the conspiracy mashup I was listening to. Why? For ratings?) talk about these things?
Follow the money, Frances. You may not be interested in pills potions and lotions, but plenty of people are, and Alex Jones and Mike Adams are not too proud to sell off the back of their wagon while they’re preachin’ the gospel.
Without the market for salacious news about Cathy O’Brien, or Epstein, or Diddy (Diddy? What happened to Diddy? Where’s he at in the news cycle? Epstein—>Diddy—>Epstein—> It’s a game of three card monty: keep your eye on the pretty red queen! That list— those lists— have got to be real!!), these guys would be broke and living in a van down by the river.
People need this sleight of hand, this game of smoke and mirrors, to distract themselves from the terror of living in a jungle. You don’t seem to need that Frances, but millions of “truthers” do.
They are the market that buys the “product” from the despicable vendors; are they despicable too?
So the question I’m asking: can you respect and allow room for my point of view, the way I respect your research and point of view?
Can we live in the same foxhole in the coming storm?
To me, that is the point of the video in a nutshell.
If loosh means attention then why do you insist upon focusing my attention on something I have clearly stated is a time wasting topic?
It is a silly word invented by an attention seeker to terrorise people into believing that there are invisible enemies, supernatural beings sucking up emotional energy as some sort of sustenance.
Scuse me for yawning and rolling my eyes, please!
I simply do not embrace quasi-religious clap-trap - I have better things to do with my energy and time..... and I won't be living in any damn foxhole in this life nor the next!
I sincerely hope Mark Passio sorts his life out - I thought he claimed to be a Satanist and frankly, I really don't care what significance the Big G has to freemasons. They ain't right in the head either.
I think this response is valid, I respect it, and says a lot about how things stand in the “group consensus” community (formerly known as the “truth community”).
I won’t “take” any more of your attention, attention that you chose to give freely.
I don't believe there has ever been a 'truth community' and the concept of group consensus is alien to me. That is another figment of someone's wishful but ignorant thinking. If we were to achieve anything resembling group consensus then progress would grind to a rotting halt! Where is the inspiration in that?
I think the whole purpose of living is to learn how to be!
This learning process is not easy or pretty. But it is true freedom. We can no longer let paradise remain a metaphysical concept.
We have to make it a reality.
Our enemies want to control our consciousness, our individual souls. That is their plan with their New World Order, where all of us will be microchipped and drugged servants of global governance. That is their plan with a universal religion, where all will surrender their individuality and amalgamate into Oneness consciousness: the impersonal consciousness of “enlightenment” — stripped of desires, originality, joy, passion, and the power to choose.
We either let them accomplish this by doing nothing, or we take action now.
We pick up the forgotten key to freedom, call it whatever you will: choice, personal will, authoritative intent, impassioned and confident desire. We elect to become manifestations of the Infinite that we forgot how to be. We take back our birthright as expressions of the original, loving, joyous divine intention.
The Infinite shows the way if we simply love the opportunity afforded by our precious and exclusive autonomy.
Create a straw man. It is easy to knock over. Make the straw man have likeness to the steel man. The resemblance between the two must be good under cursory examination. Knock over the straw man with ease. Stand over the bones of the straw man laughing and ridiculing its pathetic vulnerabilities. Make no underlying distinction between the straw man and the steel man. Use them interchangeably. elementary rhetoric 101
Give a very dirty baby a bath. The water becomes murky and unsettling. You decide to throw out the water. In your rush to throwout the water the baby is thrown out as a casualty of being guilty by association.
Intellect is the blade which keenly separates truth from fiction. It seperates known from unknown, what is of value from what is worthless.
Psychological operations need truth and lies mixed together, in order to create obfuscation and confusion. To be successful it's important, for the degree ,to which people in general, care about values, principe, righteousness, virtue, and life, is turned all the way down.
people hear of an atrocity and horror almost at the limit of the human imagination and it gets swept aside, debunked, and forgotten. When it happens once, the public's perception of care is slightly diminished. When it happens more than once like a never ending chain of perpetration, public perception of care significantly diminishes.
Uncover a sinister plot. Loosely define central characters and uncover multiple far reaching connections to the highest level of elite society. Stir the pot and bring the situation to a furious boiling point. Then shut it all down, turn the spot light away. Leave people with nagging questions that soon fade.
What is in fact happening to your psychology, and to your emotions when you are charged with emotion, righteousness, and a clear knowing of what is true and what is right? To hold these feeling and these ideas as they pick up speed and momentum. Then you smash full speed against the proclamation from up high that there is nothing to see here. What does that do to your capacity to care? What does that do to your willingness to be involved with the ideas you were/are so passionate about? What does it do to those that are week? What does it do to those who are strong? what does it do to all those in between? Franklin boys, pizza gate, Epstein island, covaids, 911, spirit cooking, bohemian grove, on and on and unbroken chain of horror, lies, and death.
The pattern I see is 1st the evil thing is done, then the psyop is released, then the technology of belief plays its role with the master rhetoricians employing their tactics on the unwitting masses as they writhe in agony and despair. Egggcelent, hands held together. If anyone steps out of line associate them with bigotry, hate, and terrorism. Use fear of the other to sew polarity and disunity. Constantly create us vs them modalities to make conflict if not likely inevitable.
If you are a pendulum perhaps you are enthralled in your journey from the center to the left. On your way to the left everything to the right seems wrong and irrelevant. once all the way left anything to your right although much of it still left of center, is seemingly right and therefore wrong, despite you just having been there a moment ago. Now the horror of moving right is upon you. The shock of heading in the opposite direction is at first a jagged pill. as moments pass the relevance of what is right is suddenly all that matters. What is left is now a memory as it quickly fades. The importance of what is left and what is right has now flip flopped. Values change with perceptive of the tide. The tide is key to the technology of belief. The tide is the underlying determining factor in what is what.
Imagine holding on to a sense of being that hold a duty to virtues. A duty to become more virtuous. A duty to care more about your life and life in general. A duty to honesty. A duty to integrity, a duty to courage, a duty to championing life, a duty to love, a duty to care. If you have a duty to accept when you are wrong, you are fulfilling a duty to honesty. If you have a duty to righteousness then you willingly take part in a duty to protect and encourage life to grow and flourish. Virtue makes one impervious to snake oil and artful rhetoric, because the perspective of the virtuous is grounded in the duty to maintain virtue. It anchors one at the shoreline preventing the tide from having any influence.
Dear James, I was amazed at how sync once again we get to be. i just had a rough week ( lol in fact I appreciated the challenge, brought more calories) going all out against the cathy o bryen blind followers that bind themself to hollowers.
so first i dont think your ruining your show by pissing off some faithaholic on pedosubmarines ride, i think your simply filtering the gold amongst the sand. Maybe some people start gold and turn sand as the opposite is quite the goal of the alchemist.
Maybe when you do this, some golden goat comes back to congratulate your darefull attempt at going against the wave that alrdy goes against the wave without even going back to the first current. I guess thats confusing but you do understand what i mean.
Now fun time! Guess what happened to me this week and its related to Cathy? I called her out publicly and got shut down 3 times in 1 hours. Complete silence by the host and cathy about my single simplest question, and the chat zone also wished to hear the answer by the end of my whinning. I was literaly waking up some of the sleepers so they erased me. i came back (temporary ban i guess), and kept on until well... nada... they never answered...
SO! I am asking you and i know another wise owl will read this and probably guess her name in that sentence: i want CLEAN FREE SARD ;) now the question:
What is your Grand father's of the blue lodge name?
Follow up same question, what is the name of your father?
Now i'm wondering, how come i never ever been able to found this answer altho i am quite a good gravedigger and quite a masons stalker. Here is the live event where ther is a QQQ question time in end show and a t1h22 you can see me in the chat box poundering the question. Now any of you all wise one knows the name of papa and grandpa O,Bryen?
skip to 1h22
https://www.youtube.com/live/PffqezE32HU?si=u_k471ZI57v06Ha4
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Ok my rambling on O'bryen is done, back at your show! That i soooo appreciate the value. I understand totaly your situation...being torn apart between knowing how to do the jester and please the audience but not wanting this, wanting the audience to become a jester like you and understand the beauty and art behind all this naturality. I sure thought this was the vibe and that was the goal when i rided with your crew a couple months ago.
So i just wanted to give you two notion and i'm sure you already got them in that interesting brain of yours. But knowing a total stranger from quebec as goofy as me share this notion may bring a smile back and ease the stress of ruining is groundbase. Your simply cutting badweeds to see greener grass grow in my opinion. So here is the 2 fact:
1. Even if you sometimes may feel that the unicity of your ship is not 100% top notch, your ship is on a sea where my ship is and some other pirate I know sails the same sea. We get it, so you are witnessed. That Authenticity is BeAuTiFuLl by the way, even behind that mask=)
2. Why you do this to yourself is a question simple to answer, integrity. Why you stay popular by constantly doing this auto sabotage is to answer, q charming mystery! I'm gonna follow up on your call! Cathy Obryen is a fake psyop, i think Keven Annette too, i'm even wondering about the long ago man if they werent some kinda scape goat psyop to. Like Jeanne d'arc and Gille de Raie. Rusted brand, tuck her carl's son, all the likes are like voltaire, double sided coin benefiting of the histery that provokes the mistery they promote. Same goes for all the new age and freemasons stuff. Thats why we...are thorn between this feeling( yep i considere myself in the same tourment you just shared today) so as i was saying, we are thorn between the wanting to get our fellow human out of the cavern, and tempted by using the skills we get from learning whats outside of the cavern on them to make a living. We always choose first, so we always stay on the verge of solvability.. then we go crazy cause no one sees what we see and the opportunity laying around this beautifull prison! I know! Lets call the prison FREE. what a beautifull name for a DOME ;)
Your books are the main inspiration to the one i am currently writting and if we still have a society by the time I end it, i am SURE you will love it! I'll send you one for free just for the feedback.
D'un CH.I.Q type
Well said.
I don't believe in loosh. It is as time wasting a topic as Cathy O'Brien, Epstein, Bannon and Trump.
You remember Jack kruze? The man who got some wild spirit but some brain to it? I'M still wondering if he's trustable or not, And i got this new one on my radar i'd wanna do a check on him. Ole dammegard... got any opinion on him?
Here is people i trust altho i barely know them: You, Matt ereth, James true, Yann Roshdy, elsa is elsa, terreza corragio, fast eddy, Escanor Opium Slayer, Richard Carrier, Richard of the 3 Sage, and Richard my last father in law. There's a couple more but i want to emphasize on one thing they all got in common. They all legit human like you and me. Full of flaws strenght and weakness, beautifull in there unique way. Some are rough, some are weak, some are funny some are amazone style, some hate each other some are rich most are poor, but ALL of them are WISE as F*cK! And have that one thing in common, they share the knowledge they (L)earn. TY all my virtual dojo master
I have followed Ole Dammegard for more than a decade and until recently I found him a valuable source of information. The latest missives I have seen show him irritable and disagreeable, even jaded and bored. He now lives in Bali I believe and gives the impression that he has had enough and wishes to retire. A mutual friend tried to get Ole and I together for a podcast/interview but Ole was not interested. A few weeks later he gave an interview to that mutual friend without me..... so I guess the great man thinks he is superior in some way. That is my honest experience of the man.
Geeeeez louiseeee! This time i tought i had you. Guess your really every where! Not only you know him, but decade long follow up and real life recent experience. Ok, i bow down, you couldnt give me a better answer really 😇👍
Hey France! My favorite grandma in my family of grunge gnostic on substack! Im just delighted
To see your comment here!
Cause this time, james just told something that pushes me
To write back. And i would love you to see this too and try to answer my question. ITS an easy one😅
I was out gardening while listening, going back in, shower and hop on my computer for the follow up 😊
I love you Frances, but I feel you missed the point.
It’s about a false consensus preventing more understanding. This is actually a hindrance to discovering deeper” truths”.
It’s about stacking objectives by those in the “truth” movement. Titillation to sell more pills, potions and lotions.
And books.
It’s about continuing to ask questions, and being willing to not know rather than hardening a position.
It’s about discernment.
Just my take.
I still miss the point. I am not remotely titillated and I do not buy pills, potions or books. I have seen enough of Cathy O'Brien, Epstein, Bannon and Trump to know that I am not interested to know more about any of them. They are all despicable.
Frances,
You wrote “I don’t believe in loosh”. What exactly does that word mean for you?
For me, it is attention. Focus on a particular idea, feeling or image. That’s all. There are various gradations and vectors of this, ranging from bliss, to outrage, to “garmanbozia” (awe and terror).
I don’t agree with Mark Passio on most things, but I do agree with him on his definition of the “generative principle”: that which we give our attention to, we create. The Freemasons use this principle; Passio says the “G” in the masonic logo stands for “Generative”. Claiming to be a former insider, he should know, right?
So, your attention was drawn to this thread, with enough energy to leave a comment. That motivation is known only to you. I’m not questioning your motive, just stating the fact that your attention, the “loosh” (by my definition) drew you here.
Everything you’re saying about Cathy O’Brien, et al, may be true. It’s certainly true for you, based on the energy I’m perceiving around the word “despicable”. Just my perception, but here we are, having this dialogue on James’s Stack, not yours.
I actually have compassion for Cathy. Who I find questionable is her handler Mark Phillips. He apparently got his mitts on Brice Taylor, so I find her testimony suspect as well. And I want to believe; I have a personal history in these types of matters, but I also have done my healing and shadow work around this so I don’t buy into others’ accounts blindly.
Where am I going with this?
Loosh is real.
It’s demand side economics.
Why do these people (and I’m including Alex Jones and Joe Rogan in this as well, along with many others. I recently watched a video by Matt Ehret, whose erudition on matters I respect from his work on Global Research, and was appalled at the conspiracy mashup I was listening to. Why? For ratings?) talk about these things?
Follow the money, Frances. You may not be interested in pills potions and lotions, but plenty of people are, and Alex Jones and Mike Adams are not too proud to sell off the back of their wagon while they’re preachin’ the gospel.
Without the market for salacious news about Cathy O’Brien, or Epstein, or Diddy (Diddy? What happened to Diddy? Where’s he at in the news cycle? Epstein—>Diddy—>Epstein—> It’s a game of three card monty: keep your eye on the pretty red queen! That list— those lists— have got to be real!!), these guys would be broke and living in a van down by the river.
People need this sleight of hand, this game of smoke and mirrors, to distract themselves from the terror of living in a jungle. You don’t seem to need that Frances, but millions of “truthers” do.
They are the market that buys the “product” from the despicable vendors; are they despicable too?
So the question I’m asking: can you respect and allow room for my point of view, the way I respect your research and point of view?
Can we live in the same foxhole in the coming storm?
To me, that is the point of the video in a nutshell.
If loosh means attention then why do you insist upon focusing my attention on something I have clearly stated is a time wasting topic?
It is a silly word invented by an attention seeker to terrorise people into believing that there are invisible enemies, supernatural beings sucking up emotional energy as some sort of sustenance.
Scuse me for yawning and rolling my eyes, please!
I simply do not embrace quasi-religious clap-trap - I have better things to do with my energy and time..... and I won't be living in any damn foxhole in this life nor the next!
I sincerely hope Mark Passio sorts his life out - I thought he claimed to be a Satanist and frankly, I really don't care what significance the Big G has to freemasons. They ain't right in the head either.
Thanks for answering my question.
I think this response is valid, I respect it, and says a lot about how things stand in the “group consensus” community (formerly known as the “truth community”).
I won’t “take” any more of your attention, attention that you chose to give freely.
Be well.
I don't believe there has ever been a 'truth community' and the concept of group consensus is alien to me. That is another figment of someone's wishful but ignorant thinking. If we were to achieve anything resembling group consensus then progress would grind to a rotting halt! Where is the inspiration in that?
I think the whole purpose of living is to learn how to be!
This learning process is not easy or pretty. But it is true freedom. We can no longer let paradise remain a metaphysical concept.
We have to make it a reality.
Our enemies want to control our consciousness, our individual souls. That is their plan with their New World Order, where all of us will be microchipped and drugged servants of global governance. That is their plan with a universal religion, where all will surrender their individuality and amalgamate into Oneness consciousness: the impersonal consciousness of “enlightenment” — stripped of desires, originality, joy, passion, and the power to choose.
We either let them accomplish this by doing nothing, or we take action now.
We pick up the forgotten key to freedom, call it whatever you will: choice, personal will, authoritative intent, impassioned and confident desire. We elect to become manifestations of the Infinite that we forgot how to be. We take back our birthright as expressions of the original, loving, joyous divine intention.
The Infinite shows the way if we simply love the opportunity afforded by our precious and exclusive autonomy.
Create a straw man. It is easy to knock over. Make the straw man have likeness to the steel man. The resemblance between the two must be good under cursory examination. Knock over the straw man with ease. Stand over the bones of the straw man laughing and ridiculing its pathetic vulnerabilities. Make no underlying distinction between the straw man and the steel man. Use them interchangeably. elementary rhetoric 101
Give a very dirty baby a bath. The water becomes murky and unsettling. You decide to throw out the water. In your rush to throwout the water the baby is thrown out as a casualty of being guilty by association.
Intellect is the blade which keenly separates truth from fiction. It seperates known from unknown, what is of value from what is worthless.
Psychological operations need truth and lies mixed together, in order to create obfuscation and confusion. To be successful it's important, for the degree ,to which people in general, care about values, principe, righteousness, virtue, and life, is turned all the way down.
people hear of an atrocity and horror almost at the limit of the human imagination and it gets swept aside, debunked, and forgotten. When it happens once, the public's perception of care is slightly diminished. When it happens more than once like a never ending chain of perpetration, public perception of care significantly diminishes.
Uncover a sinister plot. Loosely define central characters and uncover multiple far reaching connections to the highest level of elite society. Stir the pot and bring the situation to a furious boiling point. Then shut it all down, turn the spot light away. Leave people with nagging questions that soon fade.
What is in fact happening to your psychology, and to your emotions when you are charged with emotion, righteousness, and a clear knowing of what is true and what is right? To hold these feeling and these ideas as they pick up speed and momentum. Then you smash full speed against the proclamation from up high that there is nothing to see here. What does that do to your capacity to care? What does that do to your willingness to be involved with the ideas you were/are so passionate about? What does it do to those that are week? What does it do to those who are strong? what does it do to all those in between? Franklin boys, pizza gate, Epstein island, covaids, 911, spirit cooking, bohemian grove, on and on and unbroken chain of horror, lies, and death.
The pattern I see is 1st the evil thing is done, then the psyop is released, then the technology of belief plays its role with the master rhetoricians employing their tactics on the unwitting masses as they writhe in agony and despair. Egggcelent, hands held together. If anyone steps out of line associate them with bigotry, hate, and terrorism. Use fear of the other to sew polarity and disunity. Constantly create us vs them modalities to make conflict if not likely inevitable.
If you are a pendulum perhaps you are enthralled in your journey from the center to the left. On your way to the left everything to the right seems wrong and irrelevant. once all the way left anything to your right although much of it still left of center, is seemingly right and therefore wrong, despite you just having been there a moment ago. Now the horror of moving right is upon you. The shock of heading in the opposite direction is at first a jagged pill. as moments pass the relevance of what is right is suddenly all that matters. What is left is now a memory as it quickly fades. The importance of what is left and what is right has now flip flopped. Values change with perceptive of the tide. The tide is key to the technology of belief. The tide is the underlying determining factor in what is what.
Imagine holding on to a sense of being that hold a duty to virtues. A duty to become more virtuous. A duty to care more about your life and life in general. A duty to honesty. A duty to integrity, a duty to courage, a duty to championing life, a duty to love, a duty to care. If you have a duty to accept when you are wrong, you are fulfilling a duty to honesty. If you have a duty to righteousness then you willingly take part in a duty to protect and encourage life to grow and flourish. Virtue makes one impervious to snake oil and artful rhetoric, because the perspective of the virtuous is grounded in the duty to maintain virtue. It anchors one at the shoreline preventing the tide from having any influence.
how to piss off everyone while telling the truth ;) i'll give this for a description lol